|
July 23, 2008 - 12:08 (GMT)
Welcome to the PuzzleUp; a problem and games site where each week a different problem is put accross for you to think on and try to solve.
The fundamental aim of this site is to support and raise persons of the information age who have highly developed capabilities of thinking, perceiving and problem solving and who are able to interpret different cultures and contribute to contemporary civilisation.
To keep us on track and give us direction we look forward to hearing your criticisms and suggestions.
Hoping that wisdom, peace and love will master the future of the world we live in.
Emrehan Halici
|
|
Puzzleup 2008 has ended, and the results are now available. Let us congratulate these "Top 10" outstanding competitors.
Final Scoreboard of 2008
Thanks go to all who have volunteered their time and energy to make this competition happen in 2008.
We want to take this opportunity to wish you all a new prosperous year.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the nice competition. However based on my memory on the previous year competition, I believe this competition could have been more challenging. I hope to see a puzzleup-2009 with more higher information between intelligence and score table(as was 2005)
Balakrishnan - January 02, 2009 - 18:55
|
|
 Thanks and archive question
To the Puzzleup Team: Thank you so much for all your efforts in giving us a challenging and fun competition!
I am interested in accessing some of the puzzles from previous years. Is there any way they could be made part of the Archive?
Again, many thanks to all, and Happy New Year!
Clive Dawson
Austin, Texas, USA
clivedaw - December 31, 2008 - 21:28
|
|
 Scoreboard
Ring...ring...ring...ading!
Last call for November Scoreboard!
geophil - November 29, 2008 - 22:37
|
|
 [Geometric Sequence] easy but nice one
It just took couple of minutes.
srihari - November 05, 2008 - 17:34
|
|
 [Height Row]
a little crazy
rmbswd - October 31, 2008 - 03:27
|
|
 [Height Row]
An interesting side question: Find the closed form expression for general n.
Balakrishnan - October 30, 2008 - 14:31
|
|
 Clarification for Question #14
A few fellow PuzzleUp contenders e-mailed us and commented on the question text. It was apparent that the shape of a 4x4 room was misunderstood. To clarify the question, a short expression “(square array)” was added after the expression “4x4”. Also, the image above the question text was altered to give a visualisation of a 4x4 square array arrangement.
The question text now reads:
You will place 16 people with different heights to a meeting room with a 4x4 (square array) arrangement of seats such that each person will be taller than both the person in front of and left to her/him.
In how many different ways can this operation be carried out?
If the question was for 9 people and a 3x3 arrangement of seats, then the answer would be 42.
Previously the question text was:
You will place 16 people with different heights to a meeting room with a 4x4 arrangement of seats such that each person will be taller than both the person in front of and left to her/him.
In how many different ways can this operation be carried out?
If the question was for 9 people and a 3x3 arrangement of seats, then the answer would be 42.
We wish a good competition for all our contenders.
PUZZLEUP - October 30, 2008 - 11:11
|
|
 Score Table
Thanks for the update - just in short times.
geophil - October 28, 2008 - 18:47
|
|
 [Spherical Triangles]
Great! Now waiting for hyperbolic triangles;-)
lupus - October 23, 2008 - 20:58
|
|
 [Spherical Triangles] physical representation
just like the intersecting planes problem in a previous year, this problem had me scrapping pencil and paper in favor of building a model. hooray for balled up notebook paper and rubber bands!
sbirenbaum - October 23, 2008 - 20:18
|
|
 [Fourteen]
One of the best problems I have ever seen. It will give you a lot of satisfaction if you do it without the computer. I loved solving it without the help of a computer.
lunatic - October 16, 2008 - 23:41
|
|
 [Tangential Circles]
Glad you changed the wording. Your site was unreachable for a couple of days earlier this week
pjhendriks - October 16, 2008 - 06:10
|
|
 [11 Footballers]
It would be nicer if the question was asked for 30 footballers. It would be more fun and would resemble the "100 numbers" problem asked in 2006. Although I detested the 100 numbers problem at that time for being too tough, I now believe that such problem should be asked to get the competition more exciting.
Balakrishnan - October 15, 2008 - 15:20
|
|
 [Tangential Circles] Change in Question #11 "Tangential Circles"
Dear Puzzleup Contenders,
The question #11 “Tangential Circles” has been changed.
The previous text of the question was:
We have four circles with different radii. In how many different ways can these circles be placed, under the condition that each of them will be tangential to all the other circles.
The layouts which are not topologically distinct will be counted once. For example, for three circles, having radii A>B>C; the layout where A and B are inner tangential and C is outer tangential; and the layout where A and C are inner tangential and B is outer tangential are topologially identical.
If the question was asked for two circles, the answer would be 2 (as shown in the picture above); and if it was asked for three circles; then the answer would be 4.
The question text now reads:
You will draw four circles on a plane such that each of them will be tangential to all the other circles. How many different drawings can you form?
A drawing formed by changing the relative sizes of the circles in a given drawing does not count as a different drawing.
If the question was asked for two circles, the answer would be 2 (as shown in the picture above); and if it was asked for three circles; then the answer would be 4.
Please enter your answers accordingly. Our apologies for the inconvenience.
PUZZLEUP - October 09, 2008 - 08:50
|
|
 [Tangential Circles]
Nice Problem. Quite easy, but i liked it a lot more than those only-by-computer-solvable problems.
pwahs - October 08, 2008 - 15:22
|
|
 [Five Boxers]
Nice puzzle image! :-)
Balakrishnan - October 03, 2008 - 02:53
|
|
 [A Target Board] nice one
nice one
sbirenbaum - September 19, 2008 - 12:53
|
|
 Leaderboard
When can we expect to see a leaderboard? We are almost half-way through the contest now...
PuzzleScot - September 19, 2008 - 12:23
|
|
 [A Target Board] Change in Question #8
Dear Puzzleup Contenders,
The question #8 “A Target Board” has been changed.
The previous text of the question was:
A target board consists of three parts, and each part has a positive
integer on it. Each contender will make 9 shots, and will have a total
point according to the numbers on the hit parts. The probabilities of
hitting each of these parts and missing the board are equal. In order to
maximize the probability of getting a total of 44 points, what should the
numbers on these parts be?
Enter the numbers in an ascending order, without leaving any spaces
between them.
The question text now reads:
A target board consists of three parts, and each part has a different
positive integer on it. Each contender will make 9 shots, and will have a
total point according to the numbers on the hit parts. The probabilities
of hitting each of these parts and missing the board are equal. In order
to maximize the probability of getting a total of 44 points, what should
the numbers on these parts be?
Enter the numbers in an ascending order, without leaving any spaces
between them.
Example: If the numbers on the parts were 1, 2 and 3; then your answer
should read 123.
Please enter your answers accordingly. Our apologies for the inconvenience.
PUZZLEUP - September 18, 2008 - 10:51
|
|
|
@angsay: Yes you are right but, to my understanding, there is no trick involved & you just need to count in a certain pattern so it is better and more reliable to write a code rather than counting manually.
@laydogan: Q7 means the current puzzle (Fourteen), thought you got mislead by the popularity level.
usinghal - September 15, 2008 - 05:45
|
|
 [Fourteen]
Thank you, usinghal, to agree with me but you said that you solved the Q7 (Lottery) within 1 or 2 minutes without computer help, really?
laydogan - September 11, 2008 - 14:58
|
|
 [Fourteen]
Utkarsh, I think none of the problems except "lottery ticket" needs a computer.
angsay - September 11, 2008 - 12:38
|
|
 [Fourteen]
Thanks a lot for re-phrasing this problem!
bromp - September 11, 2008 - 10:30
|
|
 Change in the Question
The text of the question #7 "Fourteen" has been changed in order to make the meaning more clear.
We wish a good competition for all our contenders.
PuzzleUp Team
PUZZLEUP - September 11, 2008 - 09:12
|
|
|
There are only 2 categories of problems posted here:
(a) can not be solved without a computer and requires a real brain storming to write a working code
(b) can be solved without a computer and take only a minute or two to solve like puzzle 3,6,7
I completely agree with laydogan but out of the choices available, I will prefer (b).
usinghal - September 11, 2008 - 06:55
|
|
 [Fourteen]
I do agree with Wong.
I also expect problems which are more
challenging,still not asking for a computer assistance.
angsay - September 11, 2008 - 06:43
|
|
 [Fourteen]
Though it can be solved without computer, but it is a little easy one.
wong.tong - September 11, 2008 - 04:49
|
|
 [Fourteen] no computer here!
I like this problem because one cannot solve it with the computer since the number is too large.
adrian_satja - September 10, 2008 - 18:15
|
|
 [Fourteen] My preference
I prefer the ones that can be solved without a computer help (not for this one, 14) and take at least a few hours to solve.
laydogan - September 10, 2008 - 17:05
|
|
 [Fourteen] i liked that
my vote for the best problem of the season goes to this one :)
BulentOKAN - September 10, 2008 - 12:10
|
|
 [Fourteen]
Nice problem.
angsay - September 10, 2008 - 11:10
|
|
 [Five Questions]
Easiest one...
alicanali - September 04, 2008 - 11:06
|
|
 [Five Questions]
The best problem this season. Hope to see more of those.
angsay - September 04, 2008 - 09:18
|
|
 [Four Regions]
Is it better to number the squares as 1 to 16 rather than just taking black and white chess board to make two different ways distinct which appears identical in the present scenerio.
usinghal - August 27, 2008 - 14:01
|
|
 [A Lottery Ticket]
@Utkarsh:Unfortunately,I cannot think of a logical way.This problem is mathematical,but does not challenge a programmer.I think it is not in the interest of the competition.
angsay - August 27, 2008 - 10:09
|
|
|
|
|